The effects of financial incentives on diabetes prevention program attendance and weight loss among low-income patients: the We Can Prevent Diabetes cluster-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Penetration and participation of real life implementation of lifestyle change programs to prevent type 2 diabetes has been challenging. This is particularly so among low income individuals in the United States. The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of financial incentives on attendance and weight loss among Medicaid beneficiaries participating in the 12-month Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). METHODS: This is a cluster-randomized controlled trial with two financial incentive study arms and an attention control study arm. Medicaid beneficiaries with prediabetes from 13 primary care clinics were randomly assigned to individually earned incentives (IND; 33 groups; n = 309), a hybrid of individual- and group-earned incentives (GRP; 30 groups; n = 259), and an attention control (AC; 30 groups; n = 279). Up to $520 in incentives could be earned for attaining attendance and weight loss goals over 12 months. Outcomes are percent weight loss from baseline, achieving 5% weight loss from baseline, and attending 75% of core and 75% of maintenance DPP sessions. Linear mixed models were used to examine weight change and attendance rates over the 16 weeks and 12 months. RESULTS: The percent weight change at 16 weeks for the IND, GRP, and AC participants were similar, at - 2.6, - 3.1%, and - 3.4%, respectively. However, participants achieving 5% weight loss in the IND, GRP, and AC groups was 21.5, 24.0% (GRP vs AC, P < 0.05), and 15.2%. Attendance at 75% of the DPP core sessions was significantly higher among IND (60.8%, P < 0.001) and GRP (64.0%, P < 0.001) participants than among AC (38.6%) participants. Despite substantial attrition over time, attendance at 75% of the DPP maintenance sessions was also significantly higher among IND (23.0%, P < 0.001) and GRP (26.1%, P < 0.001) participants than among AC (11.0%) participants. CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives can improve the proportion of Medicaid beneficiaries attending the 12-month DPP and achieving at least 5% weight loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02422420 ; retrospectively registered April 21, 2015.

Cost-Effectiveness of a Community-Based Diabetes Prevention Program with Participation Incentives for Medicaid Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost-effectiveness of a community-based Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) for Medicaid beneficiaries from the perspective of the health care sector. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: A total of 847 Medicaid enrollees at high risk for type 2 diabetes participating in a community-based DPP. STUDY DESIGN: Pre- and post clinical outcome and cost data were used as inputs into a validated diabetes simulation model. The model was used to evaluate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and health care costs over a 40-year time horizon from the perspective of the health care sector. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Clinical outcome and cost data were derived from a study examining the effect of financial incentives on weight loss. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Study participants lost an average of 4.2 lb (p < .001) and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 1.75 mg/dl (p = .002). Intervention costs, which included financial incentives for participation and weight loss, were $915 per participant. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be $14,011 per QALY but was sensitive to the time horizon studied. CONCLUSIONS: Widespread adoption of community-based DPP has the potential to reduce diabetes and cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality for low-income persons at high risk for diabetes and may be a cost-effective investment for Medicaid programs.

Financial incentives for diabetes prevention in a Medicaid population: Study design and baseline characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid beneficiaries at high risk for diabetes can benefit from the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle intervention. The We Can Prevent Diabetes (WCPD) trial examined whether financial incentives are more effective than no financial incentives in sustaining participation in the DPP and increasing weight loss. Here we describe the study design and baseline characteristics. METHODS: The WCPD was a 3-arm group-randomized controlled trial. Medicaid beneficiaries were aged 18 to 74years, had prediabetes or gestational diabetes, and were overweight or obese. Subjects enrolled from 13 primary care clinics into groups of 8 to 15 participants. Participants received the 12-month DPP delivered by the YMCA or trained clinic staff, free of costs. Participants from groups randomized into the intervention conditions were eligible to receive incentives up to $520 by attending sessions and meeting weight loss goals. RESULTS: The WCPD enrolled 1154 participants into 98 groups. Among the 847 attending at least one DPP session, 71.2% were women; the mean age was 48.3years; 79.3% were obese; and 87.6% entered the study with an elevated HbA1c or fasting plasma glucose. Participants' primary languages were Somali (21.0%), Hmong (3.1%), Spanish (2.2%), or English (72.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The WCPD trial demonstrated that a collaborative approach with primary care clinics and the YMCA can efficiently identify, enroll, and deliver the 12-month DPP to Medicaid beneficiaries. If the WCPD incentive arms increase attendance and weight loss, the use of financial incentives may be an avenue for engaging low-income, high-risk patients in lifestyle change.